Grateful Dead 08/05/71
Hollywood Palladium, Hollywood, CA
Source Summary
flac16; MR > R > CD > EAC > WAV > FLAC MAR (Harvey Kaslow)* @ 7 1/2 ips. > R @ 7 1/2 ips. (Will Boswell via Rob Bertrando) Maxell UD tape > CD 'loser' was missing on this reel but used Don Wolfe's MAR>R>R @ 3 3/4 ips copy... One of the mics malfunctioned before the second set resulting in a mono recording on set 2 R copied @ 7.5 ips using a Revox A-77>A-77 --- Mastered to cd by Matt Smith --- Playback info: R > Akai GX625 > apogee mini me (24/96) > apogee mini dac (monitoring) > Lynx One soundcard > wavelab 5.0 (dithered to 20/44) > CD ** > EAC > WAV (shntool confirms no sbes) > FLAC (TLH)
Grateful Dead
Hollywood Palladium
Hollywood, CA
Aug 5 1971

MR > R > CD > EAC > WAV > FLAC

MAR (Harvey Kaslow)* @ 7 1/2 ips. > R @ 7 1/2 ips. (Will Boswell via Rob Bertrando) Maxell UD tape > CD  'loser' was missing on this reel but used Don Wolfe's MAR>R>R @ 3 3/4 ips copy...  One of the mics malfunctioned before the second set resulting in a mono recording on set 2

R copied @ 7.5 ips using a Revox A-77>A-77 --- Mastered to cd by Matt Smith --- Playback info: R > Akai GX625 > apogee mini me (24/96) > apogee  mini dac (monitoring) > Lynx One soundcard > wavelab 5.0 (dithered to 20/44) > CD ** > EAC > WAV (shntool confirms no sbes) > FLAC (TLH)

disc 1 set 1

01. Intro > Bertha
02. Me and My Uncle
03. Mr. Charlie
04. Sugaree
05. El Paso
06. Cryptical Envelopment >
07. Drums >
08. That's it for the Other One >
09. Wharf Rat
10. Me and Bobby McGee
11. Casey Jones


disc 2 set 2:

01. Truckin'
02. Loser
xxxxx Sugar Magnolia // (Missing)
xxxxx Bird Song (Missing)
xxxxx Not Fade Away (Missing)
03. Goin' Down the Road Feeling Bad >
04. Not Fade Away
05. Johnny B. Goode


notes:

I want to thank Will Boswell & Matt Smith for this gem, and especially Matt for his generosity and friendship.
8 5 & 6 1971 are legendary audience recordings. they simply sound great!

while I'm sure you're content if not ecstatic with what you already have, there are a few reasons to consider acquiring this dat-less version new to general circulation (and please understand this isn't a competition and I'm not trying to pit Charlie Miller against Matt Smtih).


the most recent version to circulate is the one Miller remastered:
http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=88859
>> the tape flip during the Other One in Miller's version doesn't seem to exist on this copy
>> the other repairs that were made seem consistent with a dat source not reels (drop outs and pitch correction)
>> this source seems to lack the cut Sugar Magnolia however and I have no idea why it's missing

there are a few reasons to put this source into general circulation:
1. it's important to preserve your right to choose

you're the expert in this case and can decide what sounds best to you. you, the listener, should have the choice. it would be wrong of me to hoard this and rob you of your choice in other words. when it's this close I'm not going to arrogantly tell you what sounds better or best to you.

2. lowest hq generation sources should be available

since we're dealing with hq sources in both cases, this source is technically the lowest generation we have seen and should be in circulation at a minimum. that should be a key goal to preserving the music we love so dearly, to make hq sources with the lowest generation available.


3. known transfer

another reason to add or prefer this source is we have no idea when or how Miller's most recent versions of these shows were transferred whereas we know Matt recently transferred this reel with professionally endorsed techniques and high end equipment. we simply know Miller received his DATs in 2000. As Miller explains, "I got my DAT of this show back in 2000. I have no clue as to how it was transferred. I'm sure Matt's A>D is better than the one in the deck used back in 2000."


4. unedited hq seeds should circulated at a minimum

Miller's source was "remastered" which isn't always a good thing, especially if that's all we have. Raw, hq transfers, should circulate at a minimum and are the best was to preserve the music. Once these sources are available, then remasters may or may not be desirable. But since remasters can make irreversible changes, locking us into the subjective bias of the editor, we need these hq raw transfers before we should consider possible enhancements. In this case, pitch correction has proven to be tricky business. We've seen tech wizards debate whether or not it was done correctly. Since it's very easy to over or under correct, and even tech wizards often disagree, we can only go on what feels, sounds, or seems right. Because of this difficulty, we should make sure sources like this are available.



* Recorded By Harvey Kaslow and Craig Todd
(FOB) Sony ECM-22P condenser mikes into a Sony 770 portable 7 '' reel deck.


** For the purpose of archival documentation, here are additional notes on how this seed was made, and why it was made this way. As Matt explains:

"My basic approach to transferring/mastering is LESS IS MORE. The basic goal should be to attain the cleanest signal possible going TO digital. It all starts with analog Equipment in top condition.  I've had my equipment restored and even the tape heads aligned. I also clean all the heads/ect. every reel side I play which is also paramount. Audio cables are very important as well to get a good clean signal. There can be a big difference at times depending on whatever you are using which is a whole other chapter.  Now comes the most important part, the A/D conversion.  I personally use Apogees just because they are the best in our specific usage IMHO.  Apogee's are renowned for their 'UV22HR' dithering algorithm.  this specific algorithm is used in about 80% of all the mastering houses across the country and most of the stuff you hear commercially uses this.  Even if dithered down to 16/44 it 'sounds' like a 24/96 to put in simple terms.  So basically load in at 24/96 then dither down and you've got yourself a nice, clean file to work with.  Now the DAT thing.  DATS/CD recorders are great but that's really the 'end of the chain' so to speak.  I don't mean to be a name dropper but when I was struggling trying to learn the "what the hell's the difference??" debate Jeffrey Norman put it best, "the A/D converters in DATS and CD's are compromised since it's crammed with other equipment resulting in a loss of overall dynamics.  a stand alone A/D converter that was made specifically for that purpose before going to DAT/CD/DAW is always the way to go if done correctly"... This simple fact is mainly not even considered (or understood) by most people but still, the most vital part in the transfer chain without question.  There is no doubt to me (and others) there is more dynamic range or overall a more defined sound vs. something going into just a DAT/CD recorder from analog.  A nice fat(and clean) low end is also part of the result as well lots of times that DAT transfers are missing at times.  Proper monitors are also very important too!!  I have a Mini DAC hooked into a Hafler 550 watt power amp going to a pair a very nice Audix studio monitors.  One needs to HEAR the flat uncolored signal when editing anything IMHO.  Otherwise something can be ruined forever b/c some guy decides to NR/EQ and no one will know the difference 20 years from now!!  Original transfers should be treated with great care and that's what I basically try to do to the best of my ability.  When I get it all done I also have the unique luxury of owning Jerry's old McIntosh stereo system(MR77 tuner,C28 Pre and MC2105 power amp)"

1798463fe667406f13d3861a1d50e7e0 *gd1971-08-05d1t01.flac
097d3bba1dbdedd928c99efd95060517 *gd1971-08-05d1t02.flac
59dc05843637066a8e664110b46c4b9a *gd1971-08-05d1t03.flac
a480b46bcc0ba9cf0f03adc04dc14638 *gd1971-08-05d1t04.flac
8e442bf0965dbf4732fc12f23dd2f484 *gd1971-08-05d1t05.flac
5b49b0662484221ca489249baa083b17 *gd1971-08-05d1t06.flac
eaf080a1eb0a1223011ef4750f442286 *gd1971-08-05d1t07.flac
39264a83282f759d20ce15c0455ca5d8 *gd1971-08-05d1t08.flac
466fad9197cd5e438af73a3e0330af78 *gd1971-08-05d1t09.flac
3d82f4fc1fe8abdedba6c3a1aa751241 *gd1971-08-05d1t10.flac
95b8ac30f1d1059f5b0754c650162ca1 *gd1971-08-05d1t11.flac
8911e568373f1a2059ab007f19bfb740 *gd1971-08-05d2t01.flac
45298c99c95e075b6fefd833f2766661 *gd1971-08-05d2t02.flac
ceda9c74fef0f06f949dfc916f0de957 *gd1971-08-05d2t03.flac
df63a3dcac25f8b2ec5bad7b68f7b2f8 *gd1971-08-05d2t04.flac
a06a736e6295a76c08fc9e8ba069e4ea *gd1971-08-05d2t05.flac
ffp
gd1971-08-05d1t01.flac:4a8cea7831ef652cef39d264e800f65f
gd1971-08-05d1t02.flac:ba0b7d0550a7981af7add115edd24a06
gd1971-08-05d1t03.flac:d011b3cf505f1c49e840ae53dc0bf89d
gd1971-08-05d1t04.flac:7818272aa94609ab3164d0fa63952671
gd1971-08-05d1t05.flac:5f41aba906181546a77e3e0dc063944c
gd1971-08-05d1t06.flac:851d9729b3e87023879e9e99777c0786
gd1971-08-05d1t07.flac:a312a80ed69d5826befd67029cc667b0
gd1971-08-05d1t08.flac:20085788f43a6c1ef002b2d080309bf7
gd1971-08-05d1t09.flac:f5dd9db837f37e93377591c4174493a8
gd1971-08-05d1t10.flac:c628c7535a5bfceb0939064490d6e01c
gd1971-08-05d1t11.flac:575029e46db2ea2363cb1ae4cf78897f
gd1971-08-05d2t01.flac:c41a62f7080a5028e2d5213507955dd4
gd1971-08-05d2t02.flac:4cae9e1ce5a51b42a7f6497a051f7178
gd1971-08-05d2t03.flac:277bd26eead1a542ece0021e978f0681
gd1971-08-05d2t04.flac:82543502ca3d4f4b1fca2b94b9426912
gd1971-08-05d2t05.flac:5e3d4cb21b8802b56115b3419f5c0c92

Comments
etreedb.org
For administrative requests email contact@etreedb.org
This website written by Tom H Anderson and maintained by the etreedb.org community.

Cached: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:52:22 EDT